患者,女,35岁。左腋下化脓性淋巴结炎溃破,疮口仍有较多脓腐。治疗应首选
大量咯血指的是
根据《药品说明书和标签管理规定》,下列叙述错误的是
Passage 2
Everyone knows that English departments are in trouble, but you can't appreciate just how much trouble until you read the new report from the Modern Language Association. The report is about Ph.D. programs, which have been in decline since 2008. These programs have gotten both more difficult and less rewarding: today, it can take almost a decade to get a doctorate, and, at the end of your program, you' re unlikely to find a tenure-track job.
The core of the problem is, of course, the job market. The M.L.A. report estimates that only sixty per cent of newly-minted Ph.D.s will find tenure-track jobs after graduation. If anything, that's wildly optimistic: the M.L.A. got to that figure by comparing the number of tenure-track jobs on its job list(around six hundred) with the number of new graduates(about a thousand). But that leaves out the thousands of unemployed graduates from past years who are still job-hunting-not to mention the older professors who didn't receive tenure, and who now find themselves competing with their former students. In all likelihood, the number of jobs per candidate is much smaller than the report suggests. That's why the mood is so dire-why even professors are starting to ask, in the committee's words, "Why maintain doctoral study in the modern languages and literatures-or the rest of the humanities-at all?"
Those trends, in turn, are part of an even larger story having to do with the expansion and transformation of American education after the Second World War. Essentially, colleges grew less elite and more vocational. Before the war, relatively few people went to college. Then, in the nineteen-fifties, the G.I. Bill and, later, the Baby Boom pushed colleges to grow rapidly. When the boom ended, colleges found themselves overextended and competing for students. By the mid-seventies, schools were creating new programs designed to attract a broader range of students-for instance, women and minorities.
Those reforms worked: as Nate Silver reported in the Times last summer, about twice as many people attend college per capita now as did forty years ago. But all that expansion changed colleges.
In the past, they had catered to elite students who were happy to major in the traditional liberal arts. Now, to attract middle-class students, colleges had to offer more career-focused majors, in fields like business, communications, and health care. As a result, humanities departments have found themselves drifting away from the center of the university. Today, they are often regarded as a kind of institutional luxury, paid for by dynamic, cheap, and growing programs in, say, adult-education. These large demographic facts are contributing to today's job-market crisis: they' re why, while education as a whole is growing, the humanities aren't.
Given all this, what can an English department do? The M.L.A. report contains a number of suggestions. Pride of place is given to the idea that grad school should be shorter: "Departments should design programs that can be completed in five years."That will probably require changing the dissertation from a draft of an academic book into something shorter and simpler. At the same time, graduate students are encouraged to "broaden" themselves: to "engage more deeply with technology"; to pursue unusual and imaginative dissertation projects; to work in more than one discipline; to acquire teaching skills aimed at online and community-college students; and to take workshops on subjects, such as project management and grant writing, which might be of value outside of academia. Graduate programs, the committee suggests, should accept the fact that many of their students will have non-tenured, or even non-academic, careers. They should keep track of what happens to their graduates, so that students who decide to leave academia have a non-academic alumni network to draw upon.
According to the author, which of the following is the key reason that leads to today's job-market crisis for Ph.D. students?
6月5日,买卖双方签订一份3个月后交割的一篮子股票组合的远期合约,该一篮子股票组合与恒生指数构成完全对应,此时的恒生指数为15000点,恒生指数的合约乘数为50港元,市场利率为8%。该股票组合在8月5日可收到10000港元的红利。则此远期合约的合理价格为( )港元。
下列说法正确的有( )。
Ⅰ.双边合约因为包括买卖双方在未来应尽的义务使双方暴露在对方违约的风险中
Ⅱ.期货合约由于具备对冲机制,实物交割比例非常低
Ⅲ.远期合约的两个合约如果是方向相反就能自动抵消
Ⅳ.期权合约是买方根据当时的情况判断行权对自己是否有利来决定行权与否
患者,女,42岁 。头晕、耳鸣2月余,并伴有两目干涩,胁肋灼痛,五心烦热,潮热盗汗,口咽干燥,舌红少津,脉弦细数 。辨证为