关于维生素K的叙述,错误的是( )
关于维生素K的叙述,错误的是( )
、K
为水溶性维生素
患者,男,45岁。胃脘无节律性胀痛半年,现胃脘胀满,时而伴两胁不适,呕吐吞酸,食少纳差,舌淡红苔薄白,脉弦,X线钡餐检查示胃小弯部有充盈缺损。其中医证型是
在日常生活中,我们经常会接触到一些民谚、 俗语。这些民谚、俗语蕴含丰富的物理知识。下列民谚、俗语蕴含的物理知识所属领域不同的是( )。
在“开花和结果”一节课的导入中,教师首先和学生一起观看了一段“绚丽多姿的花”的视频。学生观看视频后,对花的结构具有什么样的特点产生了浓厚的兴趣,从而带着疑问进入了“开花和结果”这节课的学习。这样的导入类型是( )。
Passage 2
Americans no longer expect public figures, whether in speech orin writing, to command the English language with skill and gift. Nor do theyaspire to such command themselves. In his latest book, Doing Our Own Thing: TheDegradation of Language and Music and Why We Should ,Like, Care, JohnMcWhorter, a linguist and controversialist of mixed liberal and conservativeviews ,sees the triumph of 1960s counter-culture as responsible for the declineof formal English.
Blaming the permissive 1960s is nothing new, but this is not yetanother criticism against the decline in education. Mr. McWhorter’s academicspeciality is language history and change, and he sees the gradualdisappearance of “whom”, for example, to be natural and no more regrettablethan the loss of the case-endings of Old English.
But the cult of the authentic and the personal ,“doing our ownthing”, has spelt the death of formal speech, writing, poetry and music. Whileeven the modestly educated sought an elevated tone when they put pen to paperbefore the 1960s, even the most well regarded writing since then has sought tocapture spoken English on the page. Equally, in poetry, the highly personal,performative genre is the only form that could claim real liveliness. In bothoral and written English, talking is triumphing over speaking, spontaneity overcraft.
Illustrated with an entertaining array of examples from both highand low culture, the trend that Mr. McWhorter documents is unmistakable. But itis less clear, to take the question of his subtitle ,why we should, like, care.As a linguist, he acknowledges that all varieties of human language, includingnon-standard ones like Black English, can be powerfully expressive-there existsno language or dialect in the world that cannot convey complex ideas. He is notarguing, as many do, that we can no longer think straight because we do nottalk proper.
Russians have a deep lovefor their own language and carry large chunks of memorized poetry in theirheads, while Italian politicians tend to elaborate speech that would seem old-fashionedto most English-speakers. Mr. McWhorteracknowledges that formal language is not strictly necessary, and proposes noradical education reforms-he is really grieving over the loss of somethingbeautiful more than useful. We now takeour English "on paper platesinstead of china". A shame, perhaps, but probably an inevitable one.
To which of the following statements would McWhorter most likely agree?