【单选题】

近期李老师的家人需住院治疗,虽然他经常晚上在医院陪护,但第二天早晨,他依旧准时出现在教室门口,从未落下一节课。这表明李老师(     )

A.

爱岗敬业

B.

廉洁奉公

C.

诲人不倦

D.

公正待生

手机使用
微信扫一扫
分享
微信内点击右上角“…”即可分享
反馈
收藏
举报
参考答案
参考解析
【A1型选择题】

不寐肝火扰心证,治宜(    )

A.

龙胆泻肝汤

B.

黄连温胆汤

C.

归脾汤

D.

黄连解毒汤

E.

温胆汤

【单选题】

Passage1

Today's adults grew up in schools designed to sort us into the various segments of our social and economic system. The amount of time available to learn was fixed: one year per grade. The amount learned by the end of that time was free to vary: some of us learned a great deal;some,very little. As we advanced through the grades,those who had learned a great deal in previous grades continued to build on those foundations. Those who had failed to master the early prerequisites within the allotted time failed to learn that which followed. After 12 or 13 years of cumulative treatment of this kind,we were,in effect,spread along an achievement continuum that was ultimately reflected in each student's rank in class upon graduation.

From the very earliest grades, some students learned a great deal very quickly and consistently scored high on assessments. The emotional effect of this was to help them to see themselves as capable learners, and so these students became increasingly confident in school. That confidence gave them the inner emotional strength to take the risk of striving for more success because they believed that success was within their reach. Driven forward by this optimism, these students continued to try hard, and that effort continued to result in success for them. They became the academic and emotional winners. Notice that the trigger for their emotional strength and their learning success was their perception of their success on formal and informal assessments.

But there were other students who didn't fare so well. They scored very low on tests, beginning in the earliest grades. The emotional effect was to cause them to question their own capabilities as learners. They began to lose confidence, which, in turn, deprived them of the emotional reserves needed to continue to take risks. As their motivation warned, of course, their performance plummeted. These students embarked on what they believed to be an irreversible slide toward inevitable failure and lost hope. Once again, the emotional trigger for their decision not to try was their perception of their performance on assessments.

Consider the reality-indeed, the paradox-of the schools in which we were reared. If some students worked hard and learned a lot, that was a positive result, and they would finish high in the rank order. But if some students gave up in hopeless failure, that was an acceptable result, too, because they would occupy places very low in the rank order. Their achievement results fed into the implicit mission of schools: the greater the spread of achievement among students, the more it reinforced the rank order. This is why, if some students gave up and stopped trying (even dropped out of school), that was regarded as the student's problem, not the teacher's or the school's.

Once again, please notice who is using test results to decide whether to strive for excellence or give up in hopelessness. The"data-based decision makers" in this process are students themselves.

Students are deciding whether success is within or beyond reach, whether the learning is worth the required effort, and so whether to try or not. The critical emotions underpinning the decision making process include anxiety, fear of failure, uncertainty, and unwillingness to take risks-all triggered by students' perceptions of their own capabilities as reflected in assessment results.

Some students responded to the demands of such environments by working hard and learning a great deal. Others controlled their anxiety by giving up and not caring. The result for them is exactly the opposite of the one society wants. Instead of leaving no child behind, these practices, in effect, drove down the achievement of at least as many students as they successfully elevated. And the evidence suggests that the downside victims are more frequently members of particular socioeconomic and ethnic minorities.


Which of the following describes the paradox of the schools?

A.
Discrepancy between what they say and what they do.
B.
Differences between teachers'problems and schools'problems.
C.
Advantages and disadvantages of students'learning opportunities.
D.
Students'perception and the reality of their performance on assessments.
【单选题】

受MHC限制的是

A.
CTL杀伤病毒感染细胞
B.
NK细胞杀伤肿瘤细胞
C.
巨噬细胞吞噬细菌
D.
抗体结合病毒
E.
树突状细胞摄取抗原
【单选题】

甲公司于2024年8月3日作出对乙公司吸收合并的决议,甲公司应于(  )前通知债权人,于(  )前在报纸上或者国家企业信用信息公示系统公告。

A.
2024年8月13日;2024年8月18日
B.
2024年8月18日;2024年9月3日
C.
2024年8月13日;2024年9月3日
D.
2024年8月18日;2024年8月23日
【B型选择题】

大量的原料药物固体粉末(一般25%以上)均匀地分散在适宜的基质中所组成的半固体外用制剂是( )

A.

凝胶贴膏

B.

糊剂

C.

涂剂

D.

凝胶剂

E.

涂膜剂

【单选题】

1998年中央决定在县级以上党政领导班子、领导干部中深入开展党性党风教育活动,其主要内容不包括(   )。

A.
讲学习
B.
讲纪律
C.
讲政治
D.
讲正气
【单选题】

羚角钩藤汤中配伍茯神木的用意是(   )

A.
平肝明目
B.
益气安神
C.
疏肝通络
D.
安神定志
E.
养心安神
【单选题】

治疗蛔虫引起蛔厥腹痛呕吐,肺虚久咳,宜首选

A.
槟榔
B.
花椒
C.
乌梅
D.
使君子
E.
苦楝皮
【单选题】

联合用药时,与高效利尿药合用增加耳毒性的药物是(     )

A.
解热镇痛药
B.
氨基糖苷类抗生素
C.
第三代头孢菌素
D.
多巴胺
E.
青霉素
【单选题】

(  )又称价格领导模型定价法。

A.
成本加成定价模型
B.
客户盈利分析模型
C.
基准利率加点定价模型
D.
风险控制措施模型