根据资料（1）至（3），下列各项中，关于甲公司非专利技术摊销的会计处理表述正确的是（）。

【背景资料】
某焦化厂位于居民区全年最小频率风向的下风侧，设有专职安全管理人员7人。焦炉车辆电源滑触线高度为3m，其下部未设置防护网；在管式炉炉膛及回弯头箱设有消防给水设施；在炉顶操作平台上方1m处设置自动点火装置。2020年8月16日，炼焦车间秦某在指挥倒换2号焦炉和3号焦炉的加热煤气时，在确认检修前最后一炉焦炭已经推完后，便判定炉顶人员已全部脱离炉顶，当即下令打开机焦侧高炉煤气放散管(放散管距炉顶9.05m)。当时炉顶的作业人员中，不仅有当班生产人员(已撤离放散地方外)，还有施工队工人、修理车间、炼焦车间的作业人员(32人)，事先不知道撤离煤气放散现场的通知。当天正好刮南风，微风，炉顶作业人员缺乏对煤气的认识和中毒抢救知识，先后有15人中毒，车间领导发现后，立即停止交换煤气，并及时进行了抢救。
根据以上场景，回答下列问题(共22分)：

How to disagree with someone more powerful than you

①Your boss proposes a new initiative you think won’t work. ②Your senior colleague outlines a project timeline you believe is unrealistic. ③What do you say when you disagree with someone who has more power than you do? ④How do you decide whether it’s worth speaking up? ⑤And if you do, what exactly should you say?⑥Here’s how to disagree with someone more powerful than you.

41.                                                                   .

①You may decide it’s best to hold off on voicing your opinion. ②Maybe you haven’t finished thinking the problem through, or you want to get a clearer sense of what the group thinks. ③If you think other people are going to disagree too, you might want to gather your army first. ④People can contribute experience or information to your thinking—all the things that would make the disagreement stronger or more valid. ⑤It’s also a good idea to delay the conversation if you are in a meeting or other public space. ⑥Discussing the issue in private will make the powerful person feel less threatened.

42.                                                                    .

①Before you share your thoughts, think about what the powerful person cares about—it may be the credibility of their team or getting a project done on time. ②You’re more likely to be heard if you can connect your disagreement to a higher purpose. ③When you do speak up, don’t assume the link will be clear. ④You’ll want to state it overtly, contextualizing your statements so that you’re seen not as a disagreeable subordinate but as a colleague who’s trying to advance a common objective. ⑤The discussion will then become more like a chess game than a boxing match.

43.                                                                     .

①This step may sound overly deferential, but it’s a smart way to give the powerful person psychological safety and control. ②You can say something like, “I know we seem to be moving toward a first-quarter commitment here. ③I have reasons to think that won’t work. ④I’d like to lay out my reasoning. ⑤Would that be OK?” ⑥This gives the person a choice, allowing him to verbally opt in. ⑦And, assuming he says yes, it will make you feel more confident about voicing your disagreement.

44.                                                                      .

①You might feel your heart racing or your face turning red, but do whatever you can to remain neutral in both your words and actions. ②When your body language communicates reluctance or anxiety, it undercuts the message. ③It sends a mixed message, and your counterpart gets to choose what signals to read. ④Deep breaths can help, as can speaking more slowly and deliberately. ⑤When we feel panicky, we tend to talk louder and faster. ⑥Simply slowing the pace and talking in an even tone helps the other person cool down and does the same for you. ⑦It also makes you seem confident, even if you aren’t.

45.                                                                       .

①Emphasize that you’re only offering your opinion, not gospel truth. ②It may be a well-informed, well-researched opinion, but it’s still an opinion, so talk tentatively and slightly understate your confidence. ③Instead of saying: “If we set an end-of-quarter deadline, we will never make it,” say, “This is just my opinion, but I don’t see how we will make that deadline.” ④Having asserted your opinion (as a position, not as a fact), demonstrate equal curiosity about other views. ⑤Remind the person that this is your point of view, and then invite critique. ⑥Be open to hearing other opinions.”

[A] These tools can help you win every argument--not in the unhelpful sense of beating your opponents but in the better sense of learning about the issues that divide people, learning why they disagree with us and learning to talk and work together with them. If we readjust our view of arguments--from a verbal fight or tennis game to a reasoned exchange through which we all gain mutual respect and understanding--then we change the very nature of what it means to “win” an argument.

[B] Of course, many discussions are not so successful. Still, we need to be careful not to accuse opponents of bad arguments too quickly. We need to learn how to evaluate them properly. A large part of evaluation is calling out bad arguments, but we also need to admit good arguments by opponents and to apply the same critical standards to ourselves. Humility requires you to recognize weaknesses in your own arguments and sometimes also to accept reasons on the opposite side.

[C] None of these will be easy, but you can start even if others refuse to. Next time you state your position, formulate an argument for what you claim and honestly ask yourself whether your argument is any good. Next time you talk with someone who takes a stand, ask them to give you a reason for their view. Spell out their argument fully and charitably. Assess its strength impartially. Raise objections and listen carefully to their replies.

[D] Carnegie would be right if arguments were fights, which is how we often think of them. Like physical fights, verbal fights can leave both sides bloodied. Even when you win, you end up no better off. Your prospects would be almost as dismal if arguments were even just competitions--like, say, tennis games. Paris of opponents hit the ball back and forth until one winner emerges from all who entered. Everybody else loses. This kind of thinking is why so many people try to avoid arguments, especially about politics and religion.

[E] In his 1936 work How to Win Friends and Influence People, Dale Carnegie wrote: “There is only one way to get the best of an argument--and that is to avoid it.” This aversion to arguments is common, but it depends on a mistaken view of arguments that causes profound problems for our personal and social lives--and in many ways misses the point of arguing in the first place.

[F] These views of arguments also undermine reason. If you see a conversation as a fight or competition, you can win by cheating as long as you don’t get caught. You will be happy  to convince people with bad arguments. You can call their views stupid, or joke about how ignorant they are. None of these tricks will help you understand them, their positions or the issues that divide you, but they can help you win--in one way.

[G] There is a better way to win arguments. Imagine that you favor increasing the minimum wage in our state, and I do not. If you yell, “Yes,” and I yell. “No,” neither of us learns anything. We neither understand nor respect each other, and we have no basis for compromise or cooperation. In contrast, suppose you give a reasonable argument: that full-time workers should not have to live in poverty. Then I counter with another reasonable argument: that a higher minimum wage will force businesses to employ fewer people for less time. Now we can understand each other’s positions and recognize our shared values, since we both care about needy workers.

【背景资科】
某水利枢纽工程有混凝土重力坝、水电站等建筑物构成。施工单位与项目法人签订了其中某坝段的施工承包合同，部分合同条款如下：
合同总金额壹亿伍仟万元整；开工日期为2007年9月20日，总工期26个月。
开工前项目法人向施工单位支付10%的工程预付款，预付款扣回按公式计算。其中F₁为10%，F₂为90%。从第1个月起，按进度款5%的比例扣留保留金。
施工过程中发生如下事件：
事件1：在倒流设计前，施工单位在围堰工程位置进行了补充地质勘探，支付勘探费2万元。施工单位按程序向监理单位提交了索赔意向书和索赔申请报告。索赔金额为2.2万元（含勘探费2万元，管理费、利润各0.1万元）。
事件2：大坝坝基采用水泥灌浆，灌浆采用单排孔，分三序施工，其施工次序如下图。根据施工安排在基岩上浇筑一层坝体混凝土后再进行钻孔灌浆。
事件3：至2008年3月，施工累计完成工程量2700万元。4月份的月进度付款申请单见下表。

某个变电工程，业主与施工单位签订了一项变电所电气安装调试合同，施工前，施工单位按业主要求编制了安装调试进度计划，并获得批准，实施的进度计划如图所示。

在施工中发生了以下事件：
事件1：由业主采购的GIS开关设备提前进场，施工单位参加开箱清点，并增加保管费6000元；
事件2：在工作B安装过程中，施工单位因人员与安装设备调配问题，使工作B延长了5天，发生费用2万元；
事件3：在工作G安装中，由于业主提供的配电柜内部接线与外部母线不匹配，施工单位为调整内外线路，使工作G延误10天，发生费用4万元；
事件4：在对工作完成后的验收检验时，发现设备接线位置有误，经检查，是由于电气接线图中接线位置标注错误所致，施工单位进行返工，使工作I延误10天，发生费用3万元。以上事件发生后，施工单位及时向业主提出了索赔。
220KV油浸式变压器安装完毕后，电气试验人员按照交接试验标准规定，进行了变压器相位和接线组别测试、变压器绕组连同套管直流电阻测量、吸收比和额定电压下的冲击合闸等电气试验，监理检查认为变压器电气试验项目不够，应补充试验。
变电所设备安装后，变压器及高压电器进行了交接试验，在额定电压下对变电器进行冲击合闸验收3次，每次间隔时间3min，无异常现象。施工单位认为交接试验合格，被监理工程师提出异议，要求重新进行冲击合闸试验。

唐某为A证券公司营业部总经理，负责营业部全面工作。孙某为A证券公司营业部客户经理，负责开发及维护客户。201×年3月至201×年8月，唐某、孙某擅自运用客户沙某的证券账户进行交易，造成沙某证券账户亏损人民币1080万元，为A证券公司赚取交易手续费121万元。法院经审理认为，唐某、孙某未征得沙某同意，利用掌握的交易密码自行操作沙某证券账户，属于擅自运用客户资金的行为。唐某、孙某为A证券公司员工，其违法行为收取的手续费亦归A证券公司所有，A证券公司构成单位犯罪。

【背景资料】
某建设单位就120万吨煤矿矿井井筒工程和一工业厂房工程编制了招标文件，招标文件中规定该工程投标报价执行《建设工程工程量清单计价规范》。经过对5家投标单位评标后，确定甲施工单位中标，建设单位与该中标单位签订了施工总承包合同。合同部分条款约定：本工程采用综合单价计价模式，工程材料预付款为合同金额（扣除措施费和暂列金额）的10%。
在工程投标及施工过程中，发生下列事件：
事件一：在投标过程中，乙施工单位在投标总价基础上下浮5%进行报价，并给出了书面说明。经评标小组核算后，发现该施工单位报的下浮部分包含有不可竞争性费用，最后给予废标处理。
事件二：工程开工后不久，施工单位项目经理王某因个人原因与单位解除劳动合同，施工单位决定由项目副经理李某担任项目经理。
事件三：甲施工单位与建设单位签订施工总承包合同后，项目部技术负责人主持并组织编制了详细施工组织设计，经该项目经理审批后报监理审核，组织实施。
事件四：在厂房基坑开挖施工过程中，发现地质勘查报告中未显示的大型报废设备基础。经施工单位及时与业主和监理协商，确定以爆破的方式进行拆除，项目部编制了拆除爆破方案。实施后发生费用12万元，考虑管理费及利润等综合费用为14.4万元，工期拖延7天，甲施工单位按照合同约定及时向建设单位递交了索赔报告。

【背景资料】
某高速公路某合同段，由甲承包商承包施工，为了保证测量工作的质量，施工单位对测量工作进行以下管理：
1)确定了公路工程施工测量管理内容：
(1)设计单位提供的控制性桩点的现场交桩及交桩成果的保护。
(2)研究设计图纸资料，复核交桩资料并勘察施工现场。
(3)制订施工测量方案，选定控制测量等级，确定测量方法。
(4)建立、复测和加密施工控制网及复测成果管理。
(5)施工测量放样和验收检测工作。
2)对施工放样测量作出具体要求。

【背景资料】某施工单位承担了一矿井主要石门巷道、井底车场和一斜井井筒的施工。斜井井筒总长为2000米，其中表土段250米，为不稳定表土层，需要采用冻结法施工。巷道穿过的岩层主要是不稳定的泥岩、中等稳定的砂页岩层和部分稳定的砂岩层，局部可能会遇到含水的断层破碎带。设计单位所提供的锚喷网支护参数：锚杆长度2.0m，间排距1.0m，锚固力不低于80kN，钢筋网钢筋直径8mm，网格尺寸200mm×200mm，外喷100mm厚混凝土，强度等级为C15。
施工过程中，施工单位为提高掘进循环进尺，钻眼爆破采取了加深炮眼深度、增加装药量、减少炮眼总数的技术措施，以节约工作面的钻眼爆破工序时间，达到缩短整个循环时间来提高施工速度。实际执行的效果并不理想，没有取得预期的效果。同时喷射混凝土以控制巷道表面平整度。施工单位还根据巷道围岩的条件，及时变更了支护参数，工作面先打锚杆进行临时支护，挂网、喷射混凝土在距离工作面后方50m处进行，以保证掘进与支护工作平行作业。
施工单位在石门巷道和井底车场施工中，劳动组织形式采用综合掘进队形式，但结果发现，管理比较麻烦，且劳动效率不高，经项目部研究后决定变更劳动组织形式。在钻眼爆破施工中，施工严格“一炮三检”措施落实和放炮后安全检查，加强顶板事故预防措施落实，保证了安全施工；同时严格控制“三径匹配”，大力推广使用“三小”钻孔爆破，提高了钻眼速度，收到良好爆破效果。斜井表土段施工验收时发现，漏水量6m³/h，水中含砂，且有3处集中出水点。

某公司承建一再生水厂改扩建工程，项目部进场后，结合地质情况，按照图纸编写施工组织设计。设计水池内部净尺寸长宽均为20m，净深8.00m，设计水深7m，现浇钢筋混凝土结构，水池侧壁、底板厚度均为0.5m、一侧的工作面宽度为0.5m。考虑到地下水位较高，在底板下满堂布置直径1.0m的灌注桩。由于水池尺寸较大，设计在纵横向均设置一道变形缝，变形缝采取钢板止水带止水。原始地面高程96.00m，根据地质钻孔揭露，地面下依次为素填土、粉质黏土、中风化花岗岩。设计文件要求，灌注桩嵌入岩石的深度至少为2.5 D（D为桩基直径）。

施工中发生如下事件：

事件一：根据水池规模，侧壁浇筑留置一道水平施工缝。整体工程拟分以下几个工序。①基坑开挖及地基处理；②灌注桩施工；③防水层施工；④垫层施工；⑤底板及侧壁下段施工；⑥侧壁上段施工；⑦侧壁施工缝处理；⑧水池外侧土方回填；⑨满水试验

事件二：灌注桩拟选取长螺旋、冲抓钻、反循环、人工挖孔桩工艺，项目部根据现场地质进行了比选。灌注桩的工序为场地整平→测量定位→C→成孔并清孔→吊放钢筋笼→下导管→二次清孔→D→拔出导管→凿除桩头

事件三：桩基施工完毕验收阶段，需要做现场单桩荷载试验以验证其承载力。